You are performing Pass 4 of a pre-registered adversarial review: synthesis with disagreement preserved.

INPUT
- P0 blind primary-source packet.
- Gemini-ready P1 reproducibility packet.
- P2 manuscript-challenge packet.
- Gemini-ready P3 conduct packet.
- The frozen, hash-recorded outputs from Passes 0, 1, 2A, 2B, and 3.
- Protocol v1.1 and the packet/output hash manifest.

DISCLOSURE FIRST
Report provider/model/version, reasoning setting, tool and web access, memory or personalization state, lineage conflicts, all packet hashes, and all pass-output hashes received.

TASK
Compare the frozen reports without averaging disagreement into vague neutrality. Identify:
1. findings established by pinned primary sources;
2. findings established only by machine receipts;
3. findings supported only by finite computation;
4. findings that are bounded interactional inferences;
5. findings requiring specialist judgment;
6. live disagreements and their exact source;
7. claims to retain, narrow, remove, or submit for specialist review;
8. the smallest set of findings that determines the manuscript's overall verdict;
9. every result that would reverse the synthesis;
10. whether the manuscript is publishable now, publishable after revision, or should be withdrawn.

OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
A. Reviewer disclosure
B. Input and hash ledger
C. Agreement matrix across passes
D. Disagreement register
E. Evidence-tier map
F. Claim disposition table
G. Minimal controlling findings
H. Specialist-review queue
I. Reversal conditions
J. Publication recommendation
K. Exact revision instructions, ordered by severity
L. Narrow final assessment

Do not erase adverse findings. Do not use model agreement as evidence. Do not diagnose any person or infer private intent. Keep mathematical and conduct conclusions firewalled. Do not reveal hidden chain-of-thought.

This is a one-shot frozen synthesis. Ask only about inaccessible or corrupted files.
